In her Sept. 5 (Spiritual Side) column (“‘Coming out’ for marriage equality — a letter of thanks”) Diane Meehl proclaimed her support for legal and church marriages between persons other than one man and one woman. Meehl urged Christian churches to follow suit, saying “does the church want to continue to be associated with a divisive issue about which we likely will never achieve consensus?” There are many “divisive issues” — including the divinity of Christ and the message of salvation — on which the church must take an unwavering position on principle, not on the nose count of a supposed “consensus.”

Whether the “divisive” issue is the legality or sinfulness of slavery, abortion, sex with children, incest, polygamy, or “honor killings,” the church fails in its mission if it takes its positions based upon popular vote or consensus. We might find large numbers of people favoring any or all of these practices, and thus these issues can be “divisive” once they become acceptable to a consensus-breaking number of people. The church must take stands on principle, and not live in fear of mankind’s criticism. The fear of being “divisive” creates what C.S. Lewis termed “men without chests” — moral cowards.

Richard Stevens

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.