Reader Betty Boesen (“The pill is not about religious freedom,” AFN, Feb. 29) proclaims, “The pill is not about religious freedom” and “When did a hormone become a threat to religious freedom?”

Boesen then extols all the virtues of birth control pills... the virtues of which I have no quarrel. But she makes no argument whatsoever to support her claim that the virtues of birth control pills should override the absolute religious freedom guaranteed to us by the Constitution. Nowhere does she prove a right of the government to impose rules on a Catholic charitable organization that infringe their religious tenets.

From the tone of editorials and letter writers, I guess Pastor Martin Niemöller’s statement, “they came for the Catholics, and I didn’t speak up...” is as apropos now as it was in Nazi Germany.

Now I fully expect our resident leftists to jump up and shout, “Bible thumper!”

But they are completely wrong... while raised a Methodist, I’ve been an atheist since I reached the age of reason.

But there’s no safety in that position. I understand that Hitler rounded up atheists as well. And I see no reason our present version should behave any differently.

Jim Thompson

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.