State senators refused Wednesday to let employers cite religious reasons to refuse to provide coverage for birth control for their workers.

The 17-13 vote to kill HB 2625 came even after proponents agreed to several changes designed to address complaints and concerns that the measure would force women who want contraceptives for non birth-control purposes to disclose their private medical conditions to their employers. Sen. Nancy Barto, R-Phoenix, said the new language clarified that the information would go only to the firm’s insurance carrier.

But Sen. Linda Lopez, D-Phoenix, pointed out that the legislation removes current legal protections which spell out that a woman who chooses to purchase contraceptives with her own money cannot be fired even if her employer finds birth control to be morally offensive.

Barto did not dispute that change in existing law. But she said there are other state and federal anti-discrimination laws, and that nothing in HB 2625 wipes those out.

Wednesday’s vote is unlikely to be the last word.

Barto changed her vote to “no’’ at the last minute, a procedural move that allows her to seek reconsideration. And Rep. Debbie Lesko, R-Glendale, who crafted the measure, said she already is working on lining up support — though she already thought she had.

“Two people must have changed their minds,’’ she said. Asked to identify who had gone south, Lesko responded, “I’m not going to tell you that.’’

If the defectors can be corralled again, that plus Barto’s vote would provide the bare minimum 16 needed for Senate approval. The House already has approved a nearly identical version on a 39-18 margin.

Lesko said it’s a matter of religious freedom.

A 2002 law says firms that provide insurance coverage for workers that includes prescriptions must also pay for contraceptives.

That law exempts “religious employers.’’ But that includes only churches and church-run services that hire and serve mainly those of the same faith.

Lesko’s legislation would let all employers claim a religious exemption.

“Religious freedom is under serious attack, again, as we all know, in every area of our lives,’’ Barto told colleagues in trying to convince them to support the measure. She said that includes an effort by the Obama administration to impose nationwide what Arizona already has: a mandate to cover contraceptives with only a narrow exemption for churches.

“HB 2625 is a common-sense effort to preserve these freedoms in regards to health care,’’ Barto said. “This is one of the foundational freedoms in our constitution.’’

ther than Barto and Lewis, other Republicans refusing to go along included Ahwatukee Foothills’ John McComish and Adam Driggs of Phoenix, Rich Crandall of Mesa, John Nelson of Litchfield Park, Steve Pierce of Prescott and Michele Reagan of Scottsdale.

Even if Lesko and Barto manage to push the measure out of the Senate, there is no guarantee that Gov. Jan Brewer will sign it.

The governor had expressed concerns nearly two weeks ago that women would feel uncomfortable about sharing private medical information with their employers. Lesko said the changes made in the bill should alleviate that, saying she has shared that information with the governor’s staff.

But Lesko said she has not spoken directly with Brewer. And gubernatorial press aide Matthew Benson will not comment on what his boss thinks of the measure.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.