Rejecting claims of privilege, a federal judge on Wednesday ordered Gov. Jan Brewer to turn over internal documents and memos leading up to her decision to deny driver's licenses to “dreamers.”

Judge David Campbell ruled that the documents are “highly relevant” to the claim by civil rights groups that there were discriminatory motives behind her 2012 executive order. Those documents could help these groups prove that case.

“The government is a party to this case and its intent in crafting the policy is a primary issue,” the judge wrote.

Campbell also rebuffed claims by Brewer's lawyers that having to surrender those internal documents would hinder the ability of the governor and her staff to have “frank and independent” discussions.

“Arizona has a policy in favor of full and open disclosure, as evidence by Arizona's open meetings law,” he said. Campbell noted that Arizona courts have never recognized a claim of “deliberative process” under state laws.

“Arizona state government officials, therefore, should reasonably expect that their deliberations in crafting the policy are open to public scrutiny,” Campbell wrote.

Those documents could prove crucial in helping overturn the policy, paving the way for thousands of dreamers, some of who already are driving illegally, to finally be licensed.

The fight is over those accepted into the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program announced in 2012 by the Obama administration.

It allows those brought to this country as children to remain without fear of deportation if they meet certain other requirements. DACA recipients also are permitted to work legally. The most recent report from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services shows more than 20,000 Arizona residents have applied. Some estimates have said as many as 80,000 may be eligible.

But Brewer, in her executive order, said a 1996 state law says licenses are available only to those whose presence in the country is “authorized by federal law.” She said the Obama administration policy confers no legality but simply says that those in the program will not be pursued.

But the lawsuit, filed on behalf of several dreamers, said it's not that simple.

Jorge Castillo of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund said one of the legal theories is that Brewer, a frequent critic of the president and his immigration policies, engaged in a sort of “reverse engineering.”

The claim is that Brewer first decided she did not want to grant licenses to DACA recipients and then sought a legal reason to justify it. Adding to the complexity is that Brewer's executive order was crafted in a way so as not to affect those in other deferred action programs, people who the state had been licensing all along — and who had essentially the same work-authorization documents as those in the DACA program.

That would run afoul of constitutional requirements to treat all people equally.

“There's every reason to believe that it was motivated against the people getting a DACA,” said Linton Joaquin of the National Immigration Law Center.

The situation is even more complicated.

In a ruling last year, Campbell refused to block the policy while the case plays out in his court.

But the judge got Douglas Northup, Brewer's attorney, to admit Arizona has issued licenses to perhaps 505 individuals who are neither citizens nor legal residents. The basis for the state's decision was that the Department of Homeland Security had issued them documents allowing them to remain and work in this country legally.

That, said Campbell, suggests a violation of equal protection requirements of the U.S. Constitution.

The state Department of Transportation responded last year by altering the policy, taking away licenses previously granted to those in various other deferred action programs in a bid to void that equal protection claim.

Castillo said some of the documents Campbell ordered produced should also shed some light on how that 2013 decision was made. But he said that does not legitimize the denial of licenses to DACA recipients even if even if that change was designed to provide a new defense against the equal protection claim.

Joaquin said Campbell's order also should give attorneys for the dreamers another opportunity to question state officials about their decisions. He said some of them, claiming a privilege of deliberative process that Campbell just rejected, refused to answer certain questions when previously questioned.

The victory for those challenging Brewer's action victory was not complete. The judge did allow the state to withhold certain documents that can be identified as protected by attorney-client privilege.

Gubernatorial press aide Andrew Wilder said the state will comply with the order.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.