Jan Brewer

Gov. Jan Brewer. [Howard Fischer/Capitol Media Services]

Howard Fischer/Capitol Media Services

Gov. Jan Brewer inked her approval to a new $9.2 billion spending plan Friday – but not before using her constitutional power to excise some items she does not like.

The governor said some proposals appear to have no clear purpose, like $500,000 to the Attorney General's Office for “Northern Arizona law enforcement” and $10,000 to the Land Department for a landing strip, also in Northern Arizona. And she saw no reason to spend $500,000 for an “alternative teacher development program” to find ways to put people in the classroom without going through the regular process.

But Brewer also took a particular slap at the Legislature itself, eliminating entirely – at least for the time being – its entire Ombudsman's Office.

Brewer is miffed that lawmakers added $200,000 to the agency's current $628,500 budget specifically to add staff to “prioritize the investigation and processing of complaints relating to Child Protective Services or its successor agency.” But lawmakers chose not to accede to Brewer's request to create a new Department of Child Welfare or Family Services, and they funded only $59 million of the $80 million she sought for the program.

Legislative leaders said they punted that decision to wait until a special study on the agency is completed, probably early next month. Brewer was willing to go along with that delay.

But the governor, in her veto message, said if it's too early to know what it takes to properly fund the new agency, it's also too early for lawmakers to give extra money to an arm of the Legislature to monitor the agency.

Gubernatorial press aide Andrew Wilder made it clear his boss meant it as a slap.

“They're willing to pay themselves for new staff to oversee CPS, but they're not willing to fund CPS at the levels the governor asked for,” he told Capitol Media Services.

Brewer could not simply wipe out the $200,000 increase because the Arizona Constitution allows the governor only to kill spending items she does not like. The entire funding for Ombudsman's Office is in a single line item.

Senate President Andy Biggs, R-Gilbert, called the move “outrageous.”

“We're going to take away an office whose ... purpose is standing between average men and women of this state who are being pushed around by the government,” he said.

Wilder said the veto does not mean the office, charged with helping people having problems with state government, will disappear. He said lawmakers can fund the agency again – but only when they return to the Capitol and properly deal with child-welfare funding.

But Biggs said the premise behind Brewer's veto is flawed. He said while lawmakers did not give the governor everything she wanted, they added 550 new staffers in the last 18 months. Biggs said that, by definition, will mean a higher caseload for the child-welfare agency – and a greater need for the Ombudsman's Office to help affected families.

Brewer's desire for more child-welfare funding and the Legislature's need to fund the Ombudsman's Office sets the stage for what could be a contentious special session next month.

The governor wants to create an entirely new state agency out of what has been CPS, divorcing it entirely from the Department of Economic Security. That followed disclosure that more than 6,500 abuse and neglect complaints over three years had gone uninvestigated despite state laws to the contrary.

The governor said in her message to lawmakers Friday she is willing to wait while a special panel takes a closer look at how the agency should operate and how much funding is necessary. But Brewer said she expects action once that report is completed.

“The success of the new agency will not only require a strong administrative and operational structure, but also sufficient resources,” she wrote. “It is imperative that we appropriate wisely and marshal available funds to accomplish this mission.”

Rep. John Kavanagh, R-Fountain Hills, said lawmakers purposely postponed dealing with the new agency.

“We wanted to give some degree of respect to the governor's task force,” said Kavanagh, who chairs the House Appropriations Committee. He said legislators will take a look once that panel's work is done.

Brewer's veto of the Northern Arizona law enforcement funding disappointed Attorney General Tom Horne. He said it was designed to fund a full-time presence by the Mohave County Sheriff's Office in the polygamous community of Colorado City “to be sure that the law is enforced objectively and not according to people's religion.”

Horne said he specifically wanted to be sure that the women in the community, run largely by the Fundamentalist Church of Latter-Day Saints, can escape if they want.

“And in fact there are women who did escape who said they couldn't have but for the sheriff being there,” said Horne, who has used other funds from his agency until now. “And it would be a tragedy to put it back in the hands of the marshals who are under the thumbs of the dominant church.”

Wilder said his boss was unaware of why Horne wanted the funds, and he said there was no hint of the purpose in the budget sent to her.

Horne said if Brewer had any questions she should have called. Wilder sniffed at that suggestion.

“She does not have an obligation to pick up the phone,” he said. “The Legislature has an obligation to express its intent for funding that it appropriates.”

One of Brewer's line-item vetoes stems from lawmakers agreeing with her request that the state stop imposing its sales tax on electricity and natural gas for manufacturers and smelters. The Legislature went along but concluded local governments should not have to pay for it.

The law authorized cities to opt out, but Brewer vetoed $1.3 million to reimburse counties for their loss as they do not have that option.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.