Governor could veto Senate budget plan - Ahwatukee Foothills News: Valley And State

Governor could veto Senate budget plan

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 4:45 pm | Updated: 9:58 am, Tue Apr 8, 2014.

A $9.21 billion spending plan approved Tuesday by the state Senate is unacceptable and could draw a veto, a top aide to Gov. Jan Brewer said.

Andrew Wilder, the governor's spokesman, said Brewer wants more money for state universities than the $2.5 million in the Senate package. He also said his boss is not satisfied with a Senate proposal to give district-run charter schools only an extra $600 a year in state aid per student, totaling $16.5 million, half the amount approved by the House.

Wilder said his boss is not willing to accept language inserted into the budget by Senate President Andy Biggs that says the Legislature will consider additional funds for things like child abuse caseworkers and investigators – but only after creation of the new Department of Child Welfare and Family Services.

Brewer had asked for more than $80 million in new dollars for the agency, and Wilder said the governor is willing to accept less – for now.

But he said the governor wants to be sure that the new agency has the money it needs when it starts up and not have to come hat-in-hand to the Legislature for what it needs. Wilder said Brewer wants these issues resolved before the budget hits her desk.

“Left unaddressed, it raises doubt whether or not it will ultimately be signed by the governor,” he said.

Brewer, who unveiled her own spending plan in January, also is clearly getting annoyed with the Legislature: Late Tuesday, she threatened to veto anything else that is sent in the interim.

“Gov. Brewer is saying that the budget is the state's immediate priority,” Wilder said.

That issue of university funding took center stage Tuesday as the Senate trimmed some of the extra cash the House had agreed to provide. That was even less than Brewer had sought.

In January the governor asked for $27.5 million, but only for Arizona State University and Northern Arizona University to bring their per-student aid up to parity with the University of Arizona.

That got trimmed in the House to $5.5 million, and lawmakers opted to divide that up with $2.5 million each for UA and ASU, with the balance for NAU.

But the Senate budget adopted Tuesday cut that in half. That angered Sen. Steve Pierce, R-Prescott.

He said the only reason the state has $5.5 million the money to spread around is because UA refinanced some of its debt. He said UA, having saved the money, should benefit.

Pierce pointed out that the Board of Regents requested $15 million for UA to add researchers and facilities.

“We gave them zero,” he said, even after the UA had that debt refinancing savings.

Sen. Steve Farley, D-Tucson, agreed that the school is being shortchanged.

“The University of Arizona did what was right,” he said. “They figured out a way to save money.”

Some of that is now being spread among the other schools. And some of that, Farley said, is now being put into the state treasury.

“What incentive is there for our state institutions, then, to save money if when they save money it gets taken away from them?” he asked. “Why would they work so hard so save so much money if they not going to be able to put it to good use and it's just going to get into our great slush fund up here?”

Slashing UA funding to $1.25 million was only part of what the Senate did. Biggs also inserted language designed to guarantee that none of those tax dollars could be used for the medical marijuana research the university is hoping to do.

That, however, would apparently not block any actual research if other funds could be located.

Farley had no better luck in convincing the Republican-controlled Senate to give UA that $15 million for research scientists and facilities.

“We have to respect the needs and desires of investment into our No. 1 economic engine in the state, the University of Arizona,” he said. “The kinds of minds we are training and investing so much to train every day are exactly what is going to be powering our economy for decades to come.”

One of Brewer's higher education funding priorities did survive: Both the House and Senate budgets have $3.5 million she is seeking for UA's cooperative extension service which aids agricultural interests.

Funding for universities, charter schools and the wording of a promise of more dollars for child-welfare are not the only issues standing in the way of a new state budget.

House Speaker Andy Tobin said there is strong sentiment among members of his chamber for the state to provide things like emergency dental care and podiatry services. He said the amount of cash involved is small but will save money in the long run as patients get care before they wind up in hospital emergency rooms.

More about

  • Discuss

Attorney General Forum - Question 2

Attorney General candidates Republican Mark Brnovich and Democrat Felecia Rotellini debate at ...

Facebook

ahwatukee.com on Facebook

Twitter

ahwatukee.com on Twitter

RSS

Subscribe to ahwatukee.com via RSS

RSS Feeds

Spacer4px

Attorney General Forum - Question 2

Attorney General candidates Republican Mark Brnovich and Democrat Felecia Rotellini debate at ...

Attorney General Forum - Question 5

Attorney General candidates Republican Mark Brnovich and Democrat Felecia Rotellini debate at the...

Attorney General Forum - Question 3

Attorney General candidates Republican Mark Brnovich and Democrat Felecia Rotellini debate at the...