Make Us Your Homepage
View the Online Newspaper
Publish your Stuff
Need Help? Click Here
Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
U. Frank Williams Jr./AFN
While attorneys for both sides inspect the victims' impact statements, convicted murderer Matthew Cunningham surveys the Maricopa County Superior courtroom.

Click to enlarge
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

Jurors nearing final verdict in Cunningham trial

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

Defense attorneys in the Matthew Cunningham murder trial had hoped to elicit some sympathy for their client this week, bringing in witness after witness to talk about the 30-year-old and why he should be sentenced to life in prison instead of death by lethal injection.

But by Wednesday, most of what the jury learned was that the man found guilty of killing Robert Barker and Katharine Spain in the Andante apartment complex in 2004 started doing drugs in high school, where he also ran a small gambling operation that one friend, Kurt Binder, said made $200 a week.

The jury also learned that Cunningham rebelled against his strict father, got at least one DUI while in high school, several more in college and even more after dropping out of college.

They also heard about his cocaine use increasing year after year, starting in high school and, according to Derek Voss, while attending a dry Jesuit College was found with a keg in his dorm room.

But Voss, and the others, all agreed that while alcohol and substance abuse was a major issue for Cunningham, none said they ever thought that he had a mental illness, which is the cornerstone of the defense’s attempt to keep Cunningham from being executed for the two murders.

“He is schizophrenic and I believe suffers from the disease of substance abuse,” Dr. Pablo Stewart, a psychologist, testified on Tuesday.

But Lisa Vanhaverbeck, a cousin and nurse who works in the mental health field, admitted that she thought it was drugs, not mental illness, that affected Cunningham.

Two weeks ago, after a long trial, the jury found Cunningham guilty of the murders of Barker and Spain, of two aggravated assaults and a burglary. Last week the same jury found that the crime met the legal requirements to justify the death penalty.

This week the jury heard from the family of the victims and from friends and family of Cunningham.

By Feb. 20, if all goes as planned, it will be up to the jury of six men and six women to decide Cunningham’s fate.

The jury has already been told by Judge Sally Duncan that the decision of life or death is an individual juror decision that doesn’t come with a formula.

Unlike the original question of his guilty or innocence, the jury doesn’t have to limit itself to testimony and evidence and decide as a group beyond a reasonable doubt.

In this phase of the trial the decision for the jury is if the mitigation presented, including some testimony that Cunningham was a good student and hadn’t been in trouble before the night he killed Barker and Spain, is compelling enough to warrant life in prison; or if the aggravaters that the jury agreed on last week, including how the murders were cruel, heinous and depraved, are enough to warrant death.

“The only logical, fair, merciful, just decision, is that Matt Cunningham should live,” his attorney, Larry Blieden, told the jury on Monday.

But Deputy County Attorney Mark Barry came right back and told the jury: “It was the defendant’s decisions that placed us here. He made decisions on which way his life would go.

“Do what you told us you could do, return a verdict of death.”

The trial continues Tuesday, with closing arguments set for Wednesday morning in Maricopa County Superior Court in downtown Phoenix.

More Cunningham trial coverage:

Feb. 11 - Cunningham jury hears statements from victims' families

Feb. 6 - Cunningham Jury to deliberate sentencing Thursday

Jan. 31 - Cunningham guilty in apartment murders

Jan. 29 - Cunningham's future in jury's hands

Jan. 25 - Defense's closing arguments set for Monday

Jan. 11 - Cunningham’s illness not 'remarkably consistent’

Jan. 8 - Expert says Cunningham schizophrenic

Jan. 4 - Cunningham competent says judge

Dec. 21, 2007 - Defense finds challenge in proving Cunningham insane

Dec. 19, 2007 - Defense starts in Cunningham trial

Dec. 4, 2007 - Emotions high for victims’ families in Cunningham trial

Nov. 27, 2007 - Cunningham murder trial commences

Oct. 30, 2007 - Jury selection begins in Cunningham murder trial

April 3, 2007 - Mental status could delay murder trial


See archived 'Local News' Stories »
 


Reader Comments
From the editor: Many of you have expressed concerns about some of the harsh anonymous comments from readers. To remedy that, we are introducing new features. You can create your own blog, publish your news and share your photos with the community. Once you fill out a simple form and leave a verifiable e-mail address, you can set up your profile page. It will display all of your contributions and allow you to track issues and easily connect with others.

We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.


Jobs
Autos
Real Estate
Classifieds
Place an Ad
Search for Jobs - Monster.com
   
Weather
Yellow Pages
Traffic
NWS Phoenix - A Few Clouds
86°F
A Few Clouds and 86°F
Winds From the East at 7 MPH
Last Update: August 20, 2008 - 7:20AM
ADVERTISEMENT 

Event Calendar

Featured Events

 
  • Find an Event
Publish Your Stuff
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll
Lottery
TV Listings
Safety first?
Last month, Arizona became fhte first to give the go-ahead on statewide photo radar units, with 60 to be installed on the state's freeways and another 40 "mobile" van units put into play. But the state stands to make nearly $90 million during the first ye
Putting up photo radar cameras is a legitimate way to increase public safety by decreasing highway speeds.
It's a facade. More photo radar cameras on Arizona highways is only good for one thing: money for the state.
Enter The Code To Vote
 
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site