Animal abusers would lose the right for anyone in their household to have a pet for at least two years under the terms of legislation approved Thursday by the state House.

The legislation by Rep. John Kavanagh, R-Fountain Hills, is based on the fact that nothing in current law precludes someone convicted of animal cruelty can immediately obtain a new pet.

HB 2073, approved on a 44-12 vote, would require anyone convicted to transfer all animals to someone else not living in the same house or an animal welfare or rescue organization.

His legislation would allow an individual to ask a court for permission to once again own an animal. But that would require a “showing of good cause’’ and could not happen for at least two years following the conviction.

To pick up necessary votes, Kavanagh agreed to add language that says an abuse conviction does not preclude someone from engaging in ranching or commercial horse training.

But that was still not enough to satisfy all the foes.

“I am not supportive of animal abuse in any form,’’ said Rep. Lisa Otondo, D-Yuma. But Otondo said she could not vote for the measure “as a sheep herder’s daughter, farmer and representative from rural Arizona.

Kavanagh acknowledged that his legislation, which now goes to the Senate, would mean that the conviction of anyone in a house of abuse means no one could have a pet. But he said that is necessary to protect the welfare of the animal.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.