Jon Harris, owner of the Phase 54 nightclub in Chandler, shown in the club, Wednesday, May 12, 2010, which opened its doors this past weekend. Tim Hacker | East Valley Tribune

An Ahwatukee Foothills businessman who owns a concert venue in Chandler is in a court battle against the building’s property owner and neighboring restaurant operators to keep his club open.

Jon Harris, who runs  Phase 54, which opened May 7 off Interstate 10 and Ray Road, said the venue is good for business, has adequate parking and that he received a written agreement from the property owner to open.

However, the lawyer for the three restaurants and the property owner say Phase 54 is a nightclub, which is not allowed under the property’s codes, covenants and restrictions.

The plaintiffs’ attorney Julianne Wheeler said the restaurants never agreed to the club opening and said there’s not enough parking for all the businesses, which include Outback Steakhouse, Carrabba’s Italian Grill and Charleston’s, the three restaurants suing the club.

Judge J. Richard Gama has listened to three days of testimony. He received the case after Judge John Rea recused himself last week after it was discovered his bailiff is friends with the owner of Outback.

The lawsuit was filed two weeks before the club’s grand opening. However, Rea allowed the club to open as planned.

Last week, Gama ruled that a transcript of a taped conversation from an Outback manager complaining about the race of club patrons will not be allowed in the case. He said it would create confusion for the jury.

Jon Harris, Phase 54’s owner, said that the real reason the restaurants don’t want the club to stay open is because they’re concerned about the racial background of club patrons.

Phase 54’s Phoenix-based lawyer, John Moshier, said the venue is similar to Celebrity Theater and is a concert venue first.

He is arguing that no objections were raised to the city during the liquor license and permit process, and that the club agreed with most of the 10 demands in a letter sent in March. Agreeing to those terms was perceived as an agreement to open, Harris said.

Karen Bremer, vice president of real estate for Private Restaurant Properties LLC and OSI Restaurant Partners Inc., testified that the letter was not an agreement. She said the club owner did not accept all 10 terms, so there was no agreement. She was also involved in writing the property’s codes, covenants and restrictions.

The restaurant managers testified, saying they had no parking issues when the club was open other than some valet barrier problems and cars left overnight.

Moshier is also arguing that none of the restaurant or property owners have ever been to Phase 54 while it was open and have no idea what goes on inside the club. He said the research of the club came from the website, which included old information from Harris’ previous Phase 54 recording studio and nightclub.

Harris owned the Phase 54 recording studio in Tempe for 20 years, and then opened a lounge on top of the studio for four years.

He sold the recording studio a year and a half ago.

Harris spent more than five months and more than $1 million gutting the Chandler building, which formerly housed a furniture store, to turn it into the venue it is today.

“We’re a performance venue with a stage,” Harris said. “People dance at Symphony Hall, but you wouldn’t call it a nightclub.”

The 26,100-square-foot, two-story club has a 4,000-square-foot outdoor patio, a 5-foot tall large stage with full lighting and sound for bands and dancers to perform in a concert atmosphere. A resident DJ plays Top 40 music at the club, which has 50 employees.

Phase 54, which is open from 8 p.m. to 2 a.m. Wednesday through Saturday, also features a large wine cellar.

The judge will set another court date next week to continue the case.

“I’m hoping the outcome will be that our use will be allowed,” Harris said. “I hope that we will prevail in this case or that we can come together and make an agreement and dismiss this case so everybody can save money.”

Correction: An earlier version of this story said the court battle was between the business owner and the landlord, along with neighboring restaurants. It is actually the building's owner, not the landlord, who is on the opposing side of the lawsuit.

(1) comment


It is my understanding that this place is going to close because he hasnt paid any bills, all vendors have him in collections and he owes everybody for the build. He didn't have any money and had to borrow from everyone willing to give him money, just to get this place open, they wont see a dime ever. He stated that he spent $1million, are you kidding me? I heard he lives with his parents still and is flat broke. The restaurants are right to shut this place down, it will be nothing but trouble for Chandler and all surrounding businesses. [thumbup]

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.