Olivia Long said the local family-owned coffee shop where she worked part time while going to school had to increase prices when the minimum wage got bumped to $10 an hour

Calling the voter-approved measure morally wrong, a Republican-controlled Senate panel voted Feb. 12 to ask voters to reconsider the 2016 measure that is set to hike the minimum wage to $12 an hour by 2020.

SCR 1016 would not entirely rescind what was approved by a 58-42 margin. And wages would not go back to the $8.05 an hour they were two years ago.

But it would repeal future scheduled increases, freezing the minimum wage at the current $10.50 an hour.

What it also would do – if voters really do have second thoughts – is eliminate another provision of the 2016 law says full-time employees are entitled to at least three days of paid sick leave.

Monday’s 5-3 party-line vote by the Committee on Commerce and Public Safety sends the measure to the full Senate. If it is approved there and by the House, also controlled by Republicans, the question would go to voters in November.

There is the question of whether voters really made a mistake.

Ahwatukee Sen. Sean Bowie told colleagues that the margin of victory for the measure is actually larger than most of them won their own seats. Nor was he swayed by arguments that a minimum wage hike improperly takes money from one group and gives it to another.

“We do that all the time,’’ Bowie, a Democrat, said, pointing to not only the tax cuts given to corporations but even the decision by the Ducey administration to slash the number of auditors whose job it is to ensure that these firms at least pay what they owe.

Michelle Sims, a professor of economics at Arizona Western College, testified that research she is doing for her doctoral dissertation found a vast majority of rural businesses have had to increase their prices or cut employee hours as a result of the 2016 measure.

Other rural business owners told lawmakers of their own problems and inability to simply pass on higher costs to customers.

Olivia Long, a 2017 Payson High School graduate, said the local family-owned coffee shop where she worked part time while going to school had to increase prices when the minimum wage got bumped to $10 an hour in January 2017. It resulted, she said, in customers turning to Starbucks.

Tomas Robles, co-director of Living United for Change in Arizona, the organization that spearheaded the initiative, had his own take on those stories.

“These are lies,’’ he argued. Robles cited figures that show unemployment in Arizona is at the lowest rate in a decade and that employment in the traditionally low-paying leisure and hospitality sector not only has risen since the measure was approved but has outpaced the national average.

But Sen. Sylvia Allen, R-Snowflake, the sponsor of SCR 1016, said the issue goes beyond the effect on small businesses.

“Your business is your private property,’’ she told colleagues.

“No one has the right to tell a business what they have to pay to an individual,’’ Allen continued.

That theme was echoed by Diana Links, who said she owns a catering firm.

“My family took a risk, not the voters of Arizona,’’ she said. Link said her company, which provides lunches for charter schools, has been unable to make up the difference in the higher labor costs by raising its prices.

“The minimum wage increase has been a disaster for my business,’’ she said.

And Sen. Warren Petersen, R-Gilbert, said the entire concept of having voters set a higher minimum wage is questionable.

“I believe I have a moral responsibility to be generous with my own money,’’ he said. “But I believe it’s completely immoral to be generous with other people’s money.’’

Supporters, however, saw the issue in terms of the broader good.

David Wells, research director of the Grand Canyon Institute, acknowledged that taking wages from $8.05 an hour to $12 will result in the loss of about 13,000 jobs. But Wells said his study shows that about 800,000 Arizonans will see more in their paychecks.

Sen. Bob Worsley, R-Mesa, went along with his GOP colleagues and voted to put the issue on the November ballot. But Worsley said he has no illusion that the outcome will be different, even with extensive rural opposition.

“I suspect it will pass again,’’ he said, pointing out that the vast majority of voters live in the state’s urban areas.

(2) comments


This blog does a thing of bridging the gap between reader and writer.dentistslook


Post of the day award should go to this post. This is really helpful eye-catching and telling about the new law which will be passed soon which is related to the minimum wage and this https://www.essayuniverse.net/customessayorder-review/ website help me a lot. I really loved this post. Keep sharing such posts,

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.