Proposition 115 has been clearly identified as a very bad ballot effort by the politicians to give the governor nearly complete control of judicial selection, effectively destroying the current “Merit Selection” system of selecting our appellate judges that is widely respected and copied. However, there has been less attention to what is perhaps a more ominous feature of Proposition 115: a new, broad power granted to the Legislature to hold formal investigations of any judge that is up for retention.

Arizona judges already have a rigorous “Judicial Performance Review” system. The 97th Arizona Town Hall, reviewing all branches of government in its meeting, “Arizona Government, the Next 100 Years,” stated, “Arguably no other public officials are subject to the same degree of accountability as judges.”

But now, under Proposition 115, any time the Legislature decided it didn’t like a decision of a judge (like when the Supreme Court refused to throw out the Independent Redistricting Commission) or a jury verdict (remember the Azscam prosecutions of corrupt legislators?) or a criminal sentencing, the politicians could hold staged-for TV hearings about every aspect of a judge’s performance.

Individuals who serve our state as judges already make significant sacrifices. Fewer good judges will wish to serve, knowing that they could be hauled up to the State Capitol and grilled by a hostile Legislature, any time they make a difficult decision.

JoJene Mills, chair

“No on Proposition 115” Committee

(1) comment


Prop 115 will stop the judicial assignment corruption! Currently the legal community has full control of who is assigned to each judicial position not the public. The committees who review and recommend are fully under the control of the corrupt judicial community and lawless conduct continues to go on openly. Why because the committees that hold them accountable are also under the control of the judicial community... ARS Laws are not even being followed by the judicial officers as seen in the continued corruption in Pima County Superior Court. The Judicial community should be honorable member "on behalf of the public". Which means judicial community should not be creating their own privatized government entity with the public funds and public offices. Basically hijacking the public funds for personal dictatorship! This is unacceptable. The Public needs the judicial community realigned back to accountability to the ARS Laws!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.